Islamic Perspectives
[Home]
Q & A
Burying a non-Muslim in a
By
Dr. Ahmad Shafaat
(October, 2004)
Question
Can a
Muslim husband and his non-Muslim wife be buried next to each other in a Muslim
cemetery?
Answer by Dr. Ahmad
Shafaat
This is a special case of a more general
question: Can a Muslim and a non-Muslim be buried in the same cemetery? The
common view is that it is prohibited to bury a Muslim in a non-Muslim cemetery
and vice versa except when it is unavoidable. However, this view is not duly
supported by the word of God and the sunnah of his
Messenger (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam)[1].
To be
sure, it is a very natural human sentiment that we should want to be buried
with those who share our faith in the one true God and his beloved Messenger (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam).
Furthermore, there are many
regulations or traditional practices in Islam for burial related to the type of
grave, its simplicity, putting head in the direction of the Qiblah
etc, which makes it desirable that Muslims have a separate burial area. It is
therefore not surprising that whenever possible Muslims have buried their dead
in cemeteries reserved exclusively for them.
But to declare something prohibited or haram we need clear evidence in the Qur`an and the Hadith and no
such evidence exists.
The
Qur`an contains no prohibition of burial of Muslims and non-Muslims together
and the same is true of the books of Hadith. One hadith that has been quoted in
this connection, e.g., by Ibn Hazm,
is the following:
Sahl bin Bakkar related to
us: Al-Aswad bin Shayban related to us from Khalid bin Sumayr
al-Sadusi from Bashir bin Nahik
from Bashir (bin al-Khasasiyah),
mawla of
the Messenger of God (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam) ? whose name in the time of jahiliyyah was Zahm bin Ma?bad:
He migrated to the Messenger of God (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam). He asked: What is your name? He replied:
Zahm. He said: No, you are Bashir
(henceforth). He said: When I was walking along with the Messenger of God (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam) he passed by the graves of the Mushriks. He said three times: They preceded abundant good.
Then he passed by the graves of the Muslims. He said: They got abundant good.
The Messenger of God (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam) suddenly saw a man walking in shoes
between the graves. He said: O one with the shoes! Woe to you! Take off your
shoes. So the man looked about and recognizing the Messenger of God (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam), he took them off and threw them away. (Abu Da`ud 2811[2];
Nasa`i 2021, Ibn
Majah 1557;
This gharib[4] hadith does suggest that the graves of
Muslims and non-Mushriks were separate. But note the
following points:
First,
scholars do not agree on the reliability of this hadith[5].
Second, the
hadith can establish only that separation of burial places for Muslims and Mushriks is sunnah and not that it is fard, for there is no
explicit command of the Prophet (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam). It
is interesting that the Prophet (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam)
explicitly commanded not to walk between the graves but the scholars generally
have not accepted the prohibition of this action[6],
whereas the Prophet (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam)
nowhere commands that the Muslim and non-Muslim cemeteries be separate and yet
scholars have made such separation obligatory.
Third, the
hadith talks only of the Mushriks and not of the
People of the Book who have been distinguished in the Qur`an from the Mushriks.
Fourth, some
other ahadith suggest individual graves rather than
separate cemeteries[7].
We
also find the following tradition:
Al-Bayhaqi
reports from the Companion Wathilah bin al-Asqa? that he
buried a Christian woman bearing the child of a Muslim in a cemetery that
belonged to neither Muslims nor Christians. (Quoted from Fiqh al-Sunnah[8],
Vol. I, p. 300)
Again,
this tradition cannot establish obligation, since it may be the personal ijtihad of a single Companion[9]
and the tradition is not brought forth by many muhaddithun.
Apart
from the absence of any commandment of God and his Messenger (salla
allah ?alayhi wa sallam), the
reasons given by scholars for the obligation of separate burial of Muslims and
non-Muslims are not strong. One reason given is that Muslims have their own way of burying the
dead and preparing graves. But it is possible to respect these rules even if we
bury a Muslim close to the grave of a non-Muslim.?
Another reason for obligatory separation
of Muslim and non-Muslim burial spaces is mentioned in the following comment in
Fiqh al-Sunnah on the tradition
about Wathilah
bin al-Asqa? mentioned earlier:
?Ahmad
supports this opinion because he says that the [Christian] woman being a
disbeliever, cannot be buried in a
But in
the Unseen world in which the reward and punishment of the dead takes place,
time and space do not have our usual meaning. Suppose we have separate Muslim
and non-Muslim cemeteries at a distance of 100 meters from each other. Would
the punishment of the non-Muslims buried in their cemetery not affect the
Muslims buried in theirs? If God can protect a Muslim from the effect of the
punishment of the non-Muslims from a distance of 100 meters he can also protect
them from a distance of 1 meter or half a meter or even a centimeter.
Also, how do we know that long time ago the site of a separate Muslim cemetery
was not the site of a non-Muslim cemetery?
Moreover,
since Allah has clearly declared that apart from shirk every sin may be forgiven (4:116), there is the possibility
that Jews and Christians who do not commit shirk
-- for example, by taking the Prophet?
Jesus (?alayhi al-salam) as God or worshipping his mother Mary (?alayha al-salam) --
and lead good lives may not be punished in their graves[10].
At the same time there is the possibility that a Muslim buried in a Muslim
cemetery may have committed a serious sin, e.g. rejecting the
The
truth is that what happens to us in our graves or in the hereafter depends
entirely on our beliefs and actions and not on who may be buried next to us.
Finally,
God permits Muslims to marry those women of the People of the Book who do not
commit shirk[11].
So if Muslim men are allowed to share beds and beget and raise children with
these non-Muslim women, why should they be prohibited from being buried next to
their husbands if they and their husbands so choose?
?
We
conclude: it is understandable and desirable that as a rule Muslims have their
separate cemeteries. But it is not haram to
bury a non-Muslim in a Muslim cemetery (or vice versa). This is replica-patek-philippe.sitewatches.com
replica patek philippe
all the more
true of a Jew or a Christian who worships the one true Lord and Sustainer of the Universe and does not commit shirk by deifying the Prophet Jesus or
praying to his mother Mary (may salam be upon both
of them).
It
should be noted that the burial of non-Muslims in a Muslim cemetery should be
done with the knowledge of the Muslims who buy graves there. For, otherwise, it
may be a violation of the understanding with which they purchased graves in the
cemetery.
And Allah knows best!
[1] The third source of Islamic rules is ijma?. In this
connection, we are guided by the views of those scholars who consider as
binding only the ijma?
established the time of the Companions in an explicit way and not, for example,
by the silence of our sources binding. For the question at hand we have no
evidence of such an ijma?
among the Companions. It is not clear if and when an ijma? among the scholars
developed. The first scholar to address the matter seems to be Imam al-Nawawi (d. 676) who says: ?our companions are agreed that
it is not permissible for a non-Muslim to be buried in a Muslim cemetery and
vice versa.? But this statement is not a claim of ijma?, since Imam al-Nawawi talks only of his companions.
[2] Numbering of ahadith
is according to the Hadith Encyclopedia, Version 2.1, Harf
Information Technology, 2000.
.
[3]?
The two narrations in Musnad Ahmad (19856,
20947) mention only the part about the man walking with shoes between the
graves. This raises some doubts as to the authenticity of the part about the
graves of Muslims and Mushriks, which is crucial for
the question at hand.
[4] A hadith is gharib
if in some early generation it is narrated by only one known narrator. All
narrations of the hadith under consideration in the Hadith Encyclopedia come
form al-Aswad bin Shayban (d. 165) from Khalid bin Sumayr
al-Sadusi from Bashir bin Nahik from Bashir bin al-Khasasiyah. This means that in
each of the first four generations the knowledge of this hadith was limited to
only one or a very few number of narrators, which clearly raises doubts about
its authenticity.
[5] In Ta?liqat the following comment by Ibn al-Qayyim is noted: ?People have differed about these two ahadith (Abu Da`ud 2811 and
2812); a group has declared the hadith of Bashir (2811) weak.? See also notes 3 and 4 above.
[6] See the commentary in ?Awn al-Ma?bud on Abu Da`ud
2811 and 2812. The latter hadith reads:
Muhammad bin Sulayman
al-Anbari related to us: ?Abd al-Wahhab, that is, Ibn ?Ata` related to us from Sa?id from Qatadah from Anas from the Prophet (salla allah
?alayhi wa sallam) that he said:
When a servant (of Allah) is placed in his grave and his associates
depart from him, he hears the stepping of their shoes. (Abu Da`ud 2812; Bukhari
1252, 1285, Muslim 5115, 5116, Nasa`i 2022, 2023, 2024;
best replica watches
In this hadith -- much more widely
accepted that the previous one, the wearing of shoes during walk between the
graves seems to be accepted, although as noted in ?Awn al-Ma?bud,
?hearing the stepping sounds of the shoes by the dead does not necessitate walk
on a grave or between the graves and so there is no contradiction?.
[7] For example, Ibn
Majah (1562): ?Whenever the Prophet (salla allah
?alayhi wa sallam) passed by the grave of a Mushrik
he gave him the news of Fire.? This suggests individual graves and
not cemeteries.Tag Heuer Aquaracer 500M Chrono Replica
[8] Al-Sayyid Sabiq, Fiqh al-Sunnah,
Bayrut (Dar al-Jil) and al-Qahirah
(al-Fath
li al-A?lam al-?Arabi), 1995.
[9] Scholars do not
consider the view of a single or small number of Companions as binding. For
example, according to the view of ?Umar bin al-Khattab,
pregnancy can be a proof of adultery, but this is rejected by a vast majority
of scholars.
[10] Their rejection of the prophet-hood of
Muhammad (may Allah bless and honor him evermore) in this case becomes a
forgivable sin, especially if this rejection is not based on obstinacy but on
an honest misjudgment.Tag Heuer Aquaracer Ladies Replica
[11] It is another common misunderstanding
that Muslim men can marry Christian women without any regard to their beliefs.
But the Qur`an in the clearest terms:
a) prohibits marriage with mushrik women
(2:221);
b) describes those Christians who believe
in the Trinity of God and the divinity of Jesus as Mushriks (5:72-73);
c) says that paradise is prohibited for
such Christians (5:72).
?From this it should be clear that marriage with Christians who take Jesus as God is haram in Islam.
[Home]